This could be done as an opt-in thing with Agencies. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 10:15 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > In light of our newer players’ issues with the groups, and my own, it might > be nice to allow players to repost obviously-misposted messages on others’ > behalves. I recognize that this is a risk-laden idea, though, so I wanted to > float it here first: > > * Any player CAN repost a message to the public forum, on behalf of any > person, if the message has not previously been reposted. A reposted message > takes effect as if it had been sent to the public forum by its nominal > author, not by the player reposting it. One way to handle this would be to make it take effective 48 hours after the repost. > > * A repost is INEFFECTIVE unless the message is clearly identified as a > repost, clearly identifies a single, specific author of the original message, > and reproduces, in full and without modification, a publicly-available > document [this is meant to mean “a-d emails, but not private emails]" or > message that is being reposted. Why not use "a document available on a discussion forum" as opposed to "publicly-available", the former is more clear and precise and I already keep a list of it as Registrar. > > * A repost is further INEFFECTIVE if the original author of the document > would not reasonably become aware of the repost in a timely fashion. > > * If the original author of a document objects, by public message, in a > timely fashion, to a repost, the objection immediately ratifies game state > such that the message was never sent. > > I think this is a bit of a mousetrap hazard, so please, rip it apart. I’d > love to be able to help ATMunn and other new players sort out minor posting > issues, but I don’t want to create the world’s most open-ended Agency. > > -o >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
