"These regulations are power 0.1 and may be repealed by subsequent holders
of that office or by anyone with three support"
that's probably better. although pink slips are already able to be
subjectively platonically invalid based on the same "abuse of power"
phrasing.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017, 01:33 VJ Rada, <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Title: Regulations for all
>> Author: VJ Rada
>> AI: 1
>> Create a power 1 rule called "Office Regulations" with the text
>> {{The holder of an office may promulgate regulations regarding the
>> performance of actions tracked by eir office or the performance of the
>> office's duties. These regulations are power 0.1, are INEFFECTIVE if
>> they are an abuse of power, and may be repealed by subsequent holders
>> of that office or by anyone with three support}}.
>>
>> An issue with Regs: The rule for Regs says Regs are normally the power
>> of the rule authorizing them. However, Regs is only power 1.0 so
>> anything authorising Regs must be less than that.
>>
>> ---From V.J. Rada
>
>
> No subjective platonic invalidity, please.
--
>From V.J. Rada
