On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I promise that my fix proposal has, to the best of my knowledge, no loopholes > or scams.
FWIW, it's a compliment that your past scams have been subtle enough to require this warning... (and I do believe you). > As for the campaign proposal, I shifted the duties to assessor mainly to > simplify the > resolution process, and avoid the ADoP needing to resolve the proposals. I > could rewrite > if whoever wants assessor doesn't want that extra work. I wasn't planning on being the Assessor when I read the proposal so didn't comment then, for me it's also a "hmm... may be too much, but let the next assessor decide". (One minor issue is that the Assessor only gets paid for the "first decision resolved in a week" so this adds to workload while keeping the pay mostly the same, assuming proposals are resolved most weeks).
