G. is saying that your proposal has a paradox. I haven't read through it
yet, but I don't think the correct response is to include a victory
condition in your rule.

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017, 00:58 Aris Merchant, <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 9:45 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 8 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> >   "If a person would otherwise win the game, but e, within the last
>> month, broke
>> >   the rules to do so, or another person, within the last month, broke
>> the rules
>> >   to help em win, with eir advance knowledge, and this fact is publicly
>> >   announced within a week, the win is retroactively invalidated.
>>
>> Can we put Win by Paradox back?  Because I've thought of a way to do it if
>> this is adopted.
>
>
> Write the rule and I'll put it in my proposal, assuming it seems
> reasonable.
>
> -Aris
>
>>

Reply via email to