G. is saying that your proposal has a paradox. I haven't read through it yet, but I don't think the correct response is to include a victory condition in your rule.
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017, 00:58 Aris Merchant, < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 9:45 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, 8 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: >> > "If a person would otherwise win the game, but e, within the last >> month, broke >> > the rules to do so, or another person, within the last month, broke >> the rules >> > to help em win, with eir advance knowledge, and this fact is publicly >> > announced within a week, the win is retroactively invalidated. >> >> Can we put Win by Paradox back? Because I've thought of a way to do it if >> this is adopted. > > > Write the rule and I'll put it in my proposal, assuming it seems > reasonable. > > -Aris > >>