Oh, okay, I see. Well, there goes my second attempt at taking advantage of
the cheap pend price. :P
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:41 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is actually a version of the rules so new our H. Rulekeepor
> hasn't written it yet :)
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:39 AM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 20:31 Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 20:28 -0400, ATMunn . wrote:
> >>> > Amend rule 2450 by adding the following text at the end:
> >>> > {
> >>> > If, at any time, a player owns a pledge which is impossible for em to
> >>> > break, e CAN withdraw that pledge without objection and with 24 hours
> >>> > notice.
> >>> > }
> >>>
> >>> We used to allow the Notary to do this unilaterally (without any sort
> >>> of dependent action). It lead to some fun counterscams (it's surprising
> >>> how often someone would create a contract as part of a scam and forget
> >>> to put at least one obligation in it).
> >
> > Heh, sounds fun.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On another subject, note that I think this requires waiting for 4 days
> >>> for objections, the way it's worded (not 100% sure on that). You
> >>> probably didn't mean that. You might want to define "withdraw", too
> >>> (although the natural-language meaning probably works).
> >
> > Hm, you're probably right. How exactly might I do that?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> ais523
> >>
> >>
> >> Rule 2450 already provides for withdrawal without objection.
> >
> > ...It doesn't? Rule 2450 reads:
> >>
> >> A player SHALL NOT break eir own publicly-made pledges.
> >>
> >> A pledge may be considered broken if the pledger does not complete
> >> it
> >> in a timely manner after it becomes possible to do so. A pledge
> may
> >> be
> >> considered broken at the moment the pledger engages in conduct
> >> proscribed by that pledge.
> >
> > Am I missing something or are you remembering an older version of the
> rules?
>
>
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
>
