I guess this is "an Agoran decision
to select the winner of the election (the poll).". The rule
provides that
"For this
decision, the Vote Collector is the Assessor, the valid
options are the candidates for that election (including
those who become candidates after its initiation), and the
voting method is instant runoff."
The rules now also provide no way for the ADoP to resolve such an
Agoran decision, but the election's initiation stated that the ADoP
was the resolver. I guess the election would sort of dissolve in thin
air if this interpretation was taken.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> I will contradict you. If you asked the question "is a Decision ongoing
> for these elections" I'd say the answer would be yes. I think we're in the
> Decision phase. (I'll wait for more discussion before CFJing).
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
>> If anyone else wants to contradict me on what I think happens, go for it.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:39 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I nominate myself as a candidate for both ADoP and Prime Minister. I
>> > am uncommitted.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:37 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> The election was validly initiated. It looks like for four hours or so
>> >> that we're still in the Nomination Phase: and then if there is more
>> >> than one candidate we'll go in an election, with the Assessor counting
>> >> (hope you're ok with that added duty PSS)
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, 15 Oct 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
>> >>>> 7912* Alexis 3.0 Election Campaigns Alexis 1 AP
>> >>>> [2]
>> >>>
>> >>> So, um ... anyone want to opine on the status of the PM or ADoP
>> >>> elections?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> From V.J. Rada
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > From V.J. Rada
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> From V.J. Rada
>>
>
--
>From V.J. Rada
