On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 at 20:24 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Actually, retroactively replacing an Officeholder is ugly. Better version:
>
> The following document is ratified:
> {
> [winner] has just now won an election for Prime Minister.
> [winner] has just now won an election for ADoP.
> }
>
>
After reviewing the votes, I think I didn't need the scam anyway. So I'll
not object to ratifying this, even if I'm wrong (that's my own fault if I
am).
-Alexis
