ah, ok. I figured I wasn't.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
> G. raised the question of what happened to the ongoing elections, given
> that my proposal changed the election rules without a proviso to continue
> the ongoing ones. Then VJ pointed out that e had failed to initiate the
> decision correctly (e had left out the valid options, per rule 107 this
> invalidates the decision), so there was no election to actually vote on.
> Then consensus was to simply ratify the results as having had a winning
> election, rather than try to sort through the mess of figuring out the
> status of the elections under the new ruleset.
>
> tl;dr you're not yet the ADoP.
>
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 13:20 ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Oh, wait, the argument was about the resolution of proposals 7908-7921.
>> Still, the main focus of this was around this election.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:18 PM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So I know that earlier, VJ Rada intended ratified the document saying
>>> {Just now, ATMunn won an election for ADoP. Just now, Alexis won an
>>> election for Prime Minister}, however e then pointed the finger at emself
>>> for not stating that the document was wrong. This was then followed by a
>>> bunch of arguments.
>>>
>>> So what actually happened here? Am I the ADoP now, or not yet?
>>>
>>
>>
