Actually, I agree with you. It probably should be 1.5 Agoran Consent. Or 1.4 Consent.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Madeline <j...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > Isn't it? They seem to be the same in terms of the proportion of people > you need to get on side, it's hard to see how they aren't intended to be > similar. It seems kind of strange that it's easier to award a patent title > by making an AI1.5 proposal than it is to get the herald to use the > intended AC2 action? > > > > On 2017-10-26 12:38, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> >> 1. Rule 649 "Patent Titles" requests stronger consent for awarding a >>> patent >>> title than the action itself is secured with >>> >> Agoran Consent rule isn't meant to be mapped to power the way voting >> ratios >> for full proposals are. >> >> -- >From V.J. Rada
