saying that there's a possibility it's one of those things is
explicitly inviting others to speculate on that message's purpose,
implying that there is one and the message does not, indeed, do
nothing.

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Aris Merchant
<thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's only faking if it's intended to mislead. I certainly wasn't trying to
> mislead people into believing anything. I don't even what I'd be trying to
> mislead people into believing. That it could be one of those things? Any
> message could be any of them. Any message could theoretically be all of
> them.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:11 PM VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I point a finger at aris for faking. Aris knows whether or not it is
>> any of "Part of a scam
>> *Part of a plot to permanently end the game
>> *An attempt to destroy the universe
>> *An invitation for alliens to invade earth
>> *A warning to the Party that you're all traitors
>> *A cue for your the thought suppressor in your brain to erase the
>> memory of the very exiting events that just happened... (what were
>> they again?)"
>>
>> and em saying that it is possible it is any of those things is
>> misleading: e knows which one it is.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Aris Merchant
>> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > This message probably does absolutely nothing. Probably. There is also
>> > a slim possibility that it is:
>> >
>> > *Part of a scam
>> > *Part of a plot to permanently end the game
>> > *An attempt to destroy the universe
>> > *An invitation for alliens to invade earth
>> > *A warning to the Party that you're all traitors
>> > *A cue for your the thought suppressor in your brain to erase the
>> > memory of the very exiting events that just happened... (what were
>> > they again?)
>> >
>> > All persons are invited to speculate about what else this message
>> > might be. Don't worry, we're sure you'll never figure it out (and live
>> > to tell about it).
>> >
>> > -Aris
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> From V.J. Rada



-- 
>From V.J. Rada

Reply via email to