Preserved public facilities are supposed to help new and impoverished players get some starting resources even if they don't have their own facilities. Also to give all players an additional easy source of income. Unpreserved public facilites are basically no man's land where this kind of stuff is completely allowed.
El 4 mar. 2018 19:19, "Kenyon Prater" <kprater3...@gmail.com> escribió: > I'd be willing to just contract it to a redistribution contract or just > transfer it to people or something. I agree it's pretty unfair. What was > the goal of the public facilities? Maybe we need to redo them to better > achieve that goal > > On Mar 4, 2018 6:03 PM, "Aris Merchant" <thoughtsoflifeandlight17@ > gmail.com> > wrote: > > Sigh. We really need to do something to make the distribution of > assets fair again. I mean, we can't take everything away, because > there's no rule violation involved, but we could at least even it out > a bit. The asset distribution is so unfair at the moment that I'm > worried about the long term impact. Opinions? > > -Aris > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 5:55 PM Kenyon Prater <kprater3...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following: > > > > Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0) > > Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1) > > Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1) > > Destroy 1 apple to move to (0, -1) > > Destroy 1 apple to move to (1, -1) > > Take all the contents of the farm at (1, -1) > > Destroy two apples to move to (1, 0) > > Destroy one apple to move to (1, 1) > > Take all the contents of the mine at (1, 1) > > Destroy one apple to move to (0, 1) > > Destroy one apple to move to (-1, 1) > > Take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1) >
