I'll pay to pend it if you submit it.
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote: > I couldn't myself write such a proposal, being without assets. > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:31 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > I think e should get it all back. It was harmless. > > > > If there isn't enough consensus for a w/o objection modification, > > maybe a proposal (power 2.1 does it right?). > > > > I object to Aris's intent. > > > > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Corona wrote: > >> What about amending it in such a way that everyone gets a coin and VJ Rada > >> gets the rest back? I wouldn't object to that. > >> > >> > >> On Thursday, April 12, 2018, Aris Merchant < > >> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Sigh. I tend to agree with you, actually. All of your assets is a bit > >> > much. > >> > That might be hard to recover from. However, it isn't terribly equitable > >> > for you to get off free after attempting a scam, even one that we've sort > >> > of encouraged with the Boo Lien system. Also, giving all of your assets > >> > to > >> > one contract is always a horrible idea. I'm curious what other think. > >> > Maybe > >> > you should get 1/2 or 3/4 or something of them back? Whatever it is, we'd > >> > need to come up with something that no one would object to, considering > >> > that the contract can only be amended without objection (also always a > >> > bad > >> > idea not to provide a way to amend a contract). > >> > > >> > -Aris > >> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:09 AM Ned Strange <edwardostra...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > I really do think that me losing all of my assets over this is > >> > inequitable. > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Ned Strange <edwardostra...@gmail.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > That is, I object for myself and PSS to Aris's intent > >> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Ned Strange > >> > > > <edwardostra...@gmail.com > >> > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > >> I object both for myself and PSS. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Aris Merchant > >> > > >> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >>> Well, I object. There is no reason we should allow you to reclaim > >> > your > >> > > >>> assets from a badly designed scam contract. I intend, with 2 Agoran > >> > > >>> consent, to destroy the contract "Hi". > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> -Aris > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:13 PM Ned Strange < > >> > edwardostra...@gmail.com> > >> > > >>> wrote: > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>>> I object and intend to amend "Hi!" without objection to have the > >> > > >>>> new > >> > > >>>> text "VJ Rada can transfer all assets in this contract to emself > >> > > >>>> by > >> > > >>>> announcement". > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Ned Strange < > >> > > edwardostra...@gmail.com> > >> > > >>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>> > I intend to amend the contract called "Hi", without objection. > >> > > >>>> > The > >> > > new > >> > > >>>> > text of that contract would state "VJ Rada can remove all assets > >> > > from > >> > > >>>> > this contract by announcement". > >> > > >>>> > > >> > > >>>> > -- > >> > > >>>> > From V.J. Rada > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> -- > >> > > >>>> From V.J. Rada > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> -- > >> > > >> From V.J. Rada > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > From V.J. Rada > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > From V.J. Rada > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada >
