Options 1 and 2 seem very expensive compared to the rest, and they can't possibly benefit the giving player, unlike the others, which can, indirectly.
~Corona On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote: > I remember someone saying that scary public actions weren't enough > compensation for all the power zombies provided. Thus: > > Title: Raising the stakes for zombies > AI: 2 > Author: Trigon > Co-authors: > > Create a new rule, power 2, "Zombie Networks" with text: > > The zombie network of a player is an untracked switch with the > possible values of a set containing any number of players. A > player's zombie network consists of any zombies who have that > player set as eir master switch, and the zombie networks of any > such players. > > For every player, the term "bound player" is equivalent to "player > who in in either eir zombie network or a zombie network e is in." > > For every player, the term "unbound player" is equivalent to > "player who is not in eir zombie network or any zombie network e > is in." > > Create a new rule, power 2, "Scary Public Actions" with text: > > When a rule calls for an entity to perform a Scary Public Action, > that entity SHALL do one of the following: > > 1. transfer 12 coins, 7 apples, and 4 papers to one or more > unbound players; > 2. transfer two land units e owns to one or more unbound players; > 3. build a facility on a public, unpreserved land unit; > 4. increase the rank of a facility on a public, unpreserved land > unit by at least 1; > 5. pend 3 proposals submitted by unbound players; > 6. destroy 10 or more apples (or equivalent) specifically in > actions that change the land type of land units from aether. >
