On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote: > Dude it's 5.0. Uncontested CFJs ruled that those votes didn't count. > > Anyway if I must I vote PRESENT on each agoran decision. > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:50 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote: > > Quorum on the Agoran Decisions on whether or not to adopt Proposals > > 8066-8076 > > is either 5.0 or 7.0. There were 6 votes on each Decision. > > > > If quorum is 5.0, then I have a week in which to announce the result. And if > > it's 7.0, then the voting period is extended by a week. This means that I > > can > > still unambiguously resolve these Decisions, but only if one of the > > following > > slackers attempts to cast a vote soon - even PRESENT: > > > > ATMunn, Corona, CuddleBeam, G., omd, Trigon, V.J. Rada, > > Gaelan, nichdel, Ouri, pokes, Quazie, Telnaior and 天火狐. > > > > The aforementioned (active) slackers ought to be ashamed of themselves for > > bringing this confusion upon Agora. You people are why we can't have nice > > things. I expect better of you all in the future. > > > > If quorum on these Decisions is 5.0, then the above is a humiliating public > > reminder, courtesy of Rule 2168. (Otherwise, I suppose it is merely a > > humiliating public statement.) > > > > -twg > > > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada >
