No, it doesn't matter. Moving agora further from zero is a validity condition for a Notice not a defining one, just like reasoning
On Thu., 2 Aug. 2018, 10:52 pm Cuddle Beam, <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I move to reconsider. Now that it's not void because of the 4th argument, > it can still become void become of the 1st argument, yet the 1st argument > hasn't been touched in either judgement. > > - It's not a notice of honor because it causes Agora's Honor to go further > away from 0 and only an individual action happens per instant as per CFJ > 2086, so the -1 would need to happen first, but since it would make Agora's > Honor go further than 0, it doesn't happen. > - It's a notice of honor because the notice of honor as a single unit is > the action, not the individual movements it's composed of. > - It's a notice of honor because the above doesn't matter and the player > requirement implicitly only applies when a player is targeted. > - It's not a notice of honor because it doesn't "provide a reason for > specifying that Player" (and I never can, because Agora isn't a player). > And > the implicit rule mentioned above doesn't exist. > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Rebecca <edwardostra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > you can move to reconsider your own judgements once automatically now. > > > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I support the move for reconsideration. > > > > > > On Thursday, August 2, 2018, Rebecca <edwardostra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I move for reconsideration of my judgement in CFJ 3638 and deliver > the > > > > following (annoying) judgement. > > > > > > > > Rule 2150 states that "A player CAN publish a Notice of Honour" and > > then > > > > specifies that four conditions must be satisfied for a Notice to be > > > > _valid_. Valid can be defined as " > > > > legally binding due to having been executed in compliance with the > > law.". > > > > Therefore, the rule contemplates the existence of invalid notices of > > > honour > > > > with no legally binding effect and valid ones (this is supported by > the > > > > fact that the rule attaches consequences only to "a valid Notice of > > > Honour" > > > > being "published". The statement of this case is "the above is a > notice > > > of > > > > honour". "[T]he above" is text purporting to be a Notice of Honour > > > raising > > > > and lowering Agora's Karma by 1. Whether that Notice is valid is > > > > irrelevant to the statement of this case. The four conditions do not > > need > > > > to be satisfied. It is, valid or invalid, a Notice of Honour. > > > > > > > > This is in accordance with how we otherwise use English. An invalid > > > license > > > > is still a license, an expired passport is still a passport, and an > > > invalid > > > > contract is still legally a contract if formed, just unenforced. > > > > > > > > CFJ 3638 is TRUE. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > From V.J. Rada > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ~Corona > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > From V.J. Rada > > >
