On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 6:00 PM Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > > > [This is an informal general definition that is helpful for proposals > > added again to the pool. The Assessor already has this information, > > which means that it's legal under past precedent to cast a vote that > > requires em to retrieve it.] > > The obvious question is why e should be required to keep the information > in the definition message. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. > This is intended to work the same way TTttPF works, by becoming a part of the Agoran dialect. This formal definition is merely supposed to enter the information into our collective consciousness. -Aris
