I'm wondering what happens to the word "earns" throughout these changes.
Did it get replaced by the original provision, and if so, does it get
uncorrected back correctly?
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
Wait, you want the literal opposite of this right? You want to switch it
back to “earn”. The problem is that the provision did trigger, and it
shouldn't have. I submit the following proposal:
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Title: Uncorrecting Rewards
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-authors: twg, Trigon
[
This is A.I. 3.0 because I don't know what Rule 2496's power is.
Proposal 8127 "reenacted" it, meaning it acquires the power it had
when it was originally repealed, but I wasn't around when that
happened and it's not in the SLR yet.
]
Amend rule 2496 by replacing all instances of the text "create in eir
possession" with the word
"earn".
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-Aris
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 1:43 PM Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote:
You are, of course, correct.
I submit this proposal:
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8127
Title: Rephrasing Rewards
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: twg
Co-authors: Trigon
[
This is A.I. 3.0 because I don't know what Rule 2496's power is.
Proposal 8127 "reenacted" it, meaning it acquires the power it had
when it was originally repealed, but I wasn't around when that
happened and it's not in the SLR yet.
]
Amend rule 2496 by replacing all instances of the word "earn" with
"create in eir possession".
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Notice of Honour:
-1 twg (allowing eir own moneymaking activities to interfere with the rest
of the game)
+1 Trigon (suffering eir proposal being mangled by aforementioned
activities)
(I'm virtually certain my "rewards" _do_ work, but I'm astonished nobody's
CFJed them on principle yet...)
-twg
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 3:19 AM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no>
wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
I resolve the Agoran Decisions to adopt each of Proposals 8129, 8131,
8127, 8123-8126, 8128, 8130 and 8132, in that order, as follows.
Fiendish. (Assuming this works. People might want to CFJ your double
earnings.) However, I think resolving 8127 before 8126 has another
unfortunate side effect, it causes the last paragraph of 8127 to trigger:
If a proposal by Trigon has not passed in the same distribution as this
proposal entitled "High-level asset verbs", amend rule 2496 by
replacing
all instances of the word "earn" with "create in eir possession".
Greetings,
Ørjan.
