This scam would be pretty dangerous. Initiating 495 excess cases would result in at least that many blots if someone pointed a finger at me for it!
> On Jan 20, 2019, at 1:56 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote: > > Upon examination of R2478, I think that falsely declaring a Finger Pointing > to be Shenanigans may be IMPOSSIBLE, or if not, is certainly ILLEGAL. And > that would be a violation that the Arbitor _could_ take over the > investigation of. > > -twg > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >> On Wednesday, January 16, 2019 4:20 PM, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jan 16, 2019, at 3:48 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey m...@timon.red wrote: >>> Even if I made that pledge, nobody would trust me, and rightly so. >> >> FWIW, I would trust you if you made that pledge. >> >> Theoretically, the pledge has a loophole if you’re the Referee, since you >> could decide any pointer finger regarding that pledge yourself. To make the >> pledge more airtight, you could also pledge that, if you remain as Referee >> at the time any finger is pointed for an alleged violation of the pledge, >> you would appoint the holder of the Arbitor’s office to act on your behalf >> to be investigator. (If you broke THAT pledge, I think that would be a >> violation related to your duties as referee, which the Arbitor could then >> investigate be announcement.) > >
