I understand the proposal is flawed but Telnaior is space-bullying me
and this fixes my problem.
On 2/5/19 3:28 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
I’m against the Space bullying thing because I believe it’s more
interesting if that was achieved via contracts and such. (Our own Geneva
Convention of a sort, maybe?)
It would harm the “free open world simulation” vibe that I enjoy from Space
Battles.
Also, a duo of players could still bypass this.
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 01:38, Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote:
Context for "version ∞" that I forgot to send in the previous email:
when I was going through all the proposals adding names I noticed a lot
of them had a version tacked onto the end of the title. I don't even
have a problem with versions being an informal system, but I like the
idea of them being out of the title; therefore this exists.
I also submit the following proposal, while I'm at it:
-----
Title: No one likes a (space) bully
AI: 1
Author: Trigon
Co-authors:
Amend the paragraph beginning "A Space Battle CANNOT be initiated" in
Rule 2593 (Power=1) 'Space Battles' by removing the final period and
adding the following: "or if the prior Space Battle the spaceship
initiating the Space Battle has been in was against the spaceship it is
attacking."
On 2/4/19 5:27 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
I submit the following proposal:
-----
Title: version ∞
AI: 3
Author: Trigon
Co-authors:
Amend Rule 2350 (Power=3) 'Proposals' by adding an item to the bulleted
list:
* A version, which SHOULD only be used when a proposal has been
retracted and another proposal has been created with a similar
purpose.
--
Trigon
--
Trigon
