When my spaceship was destroyed, I purposely avoided repairing it because I knew it would fail (I thought that was known and by design so I didn't mention it). I would have done space stuff otherwise. I would object to fixing it for people who didn't read the rule, except through a proposal changing the rule. :P.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:16 PM Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote: > > Now, I don't want to have to go back over every BUS message from the past two > weeks looking for what's changed, and presumably y'all would rather do > without the uncertainty of which actions were EFFECTIVE and which weren't, so > how does this sound as an equitable resolution? Would anybody object to it? > > - Publish the Astronomor and Treasuror reports as if all previous attempts > (i.e. prior to this message) to repair a Destroyed Spaceship had succeeded > (with a disclaimer indicating their technical falsity). > - Ratify without objection the incorrect Astronomor and Treasuror reports. > - Ratify without objection something of the form: "Space Battle 0005 existed, > had the combatants indicated below, and was resolved as follows at the time > this document was first published: [actual resolution]" > - Submit a proposal allowing players to repair defeated spaceships (and > defaulting new spaceships' Armours to 10). > > -twg
