I think you need to retract the previous ballots first (though "changing" a
vote is accepted shorthand)
-twg
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Monday, February 18, 2019 11:36 PM, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good point! Based on his recent hashes, he probably is. Therefore:
>
> If Aris’s message initiates any Agoran Decisions, then I vote, and I cause L,
> ATMunn, and Gaelan to vote, for the first of {AGAINST, AFFIRM, Gaelan} which
> is a valid option.
>
> Gaelan, I hope you don’t mind my changing your vote for you, but at least I
> changed it to you...
>
> > On Feb 18, 2019, at 6:32 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey m...@timon.red wrote:
> > Hold on, are we sure G. isn't in on it?
> > -twg
> > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> >
> > > On Monday, February 18, 2019 11:31 PM, D. Margaux dmargaux...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> > > Like Gaelan, I do the following, and I cause ATMunn to do the following:
> > >
> > > - object to any intents announced in the quoted message.
> > > - if quoted message initiates any Agoran Decisions, vote for the first
> > > of {AGAINST, AFFIRM, G.} which is a valid option.
> > > - if the quoted message contains an attempt to Ratify Without Objection
> > > an incorrect document, point a thumb at Aris for the class-8 crime of
> > > Endorsing Forgery.
> > >
> > > If the quoted message initiates any Agoran Decisions, I cause L to vote
> > > for the first of {AGAINST, AFFIRM, G.} which is a valid option.
> > >
> > > > > On Feb 17, 2019, at 10:31 PM, Aris Merchant
> > > > > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > I give notice that I intend to activate The Protocol, according to the
> > > > > timetable specified for activations thereof. (If anyone remembers
> > > > > what this
> > > > > means, please contact me rather than trying to block it; we may be
> > > > > able to
> > > > > work something out.)
> > > > > -Aris
