I was concerned that ratification without objection might inadvertently
break something outside of those subgames. In contrast, issuing blank Clork
and Astronomor reports would not risk causing something to break outside
those games. It would be self-contained.
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 5:12 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don’t know what the implication of that is for the sentencing, but I
> don’t think I’m going to wait. I’d prefer to resolve it now and avoid the
> ambiguity.
>
> Why did you use self-ratification, rather than something else like
> ratification without objection?
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 2:09 PM D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It may be worthwhile to wait a couple days. If the reports self-ratify
> > without any claim of error, then the information therein will be
> > retroactively accurate... I think?
> >
> > > On May 25, 2019, at 9:31 PM, Aris Merchant <
> > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I accept. I'll have to read up on the relevant rules, and I don't have
> > > the time at the moment. That said, this case is pretty simple, so I'll
> > > probably have a verdict in the next day or two.
> > >
> > > -The Arbitor
> > >
> > >> On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 3:54 PM D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> If the H. Arbitor agrees, then I authorize the holder of the Office of
> > >> Arbitor to act on my behalf to investigate and conclude the
> > investigation
> > >> of the finger pointed against me in the message quoted below, and for
> no
> > >> other purpose.
> > >>
> > >>> On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 6:02 PM omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 3:20 AM D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The below reports are false. The reason for ratifying them is
> because
> > >>> the games are defunct and because it’s too hard to figure out what
> the
> > >>> gamestate of either of them is.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I deputise for Astronomor to publish this report: {there are no
> > entities
> > >>> in existence for which the Astronomor is the recordkeepor other than
> > those
> > >>> created directly by the Rules. All switches for which the Astronomor
> is
> > >>> recordkeepor have their default value.}
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I deputise for Clork to publish this report: {there are no entities
> in
> > >>> existence for which the Clork is the recordkeepor other than those
> > directly
> > >>> created by the Rules. All switches for which the Clork is
> recordkeepor
> > have
> > >>> their default value.}
> > >>>
> > >>> I Point my Finger at D. Margaux for violating rule 2143 by publishing
> > >>> information that is inaccurate within two documents purporting to be
> > >>> two offices' weekly reports. (The documents don't explicitly purport
> > >>> to be *weekly* reports, but this can be reasonably inferred from the
> > >>> attempt to deputise to publish them.)
> > >>>
> > >> --
> > >> D. Margaux
> >
>
--
D. Margaux
