Sorry! Will do.
Jason Cobb
On 6/22/19 9:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Note from the Office of the Promotor:
Please don't use the > style quote formatting again. It makes text
formatting a nightmare, and stops me from wrapping lines.
-Aris
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:01 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
Oh, I meant to make it say "player" instead of "person who plays the
game" anyway.
I withdraw my most recently submitted proposal (again).
I submit the following proposal:
Title: Rule 2479 Cleanup (v1.2)
Author: Jason Cobb
Adoption Index: 1.7
Text:
{
Amend Rule 2479 ("Official Justice") as follows:
Replace the text
The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by levying a fine
of up to 2 blots on em. Summary Judgement is imposed on the
Referee's own initiative, and not in response to any official
proceeding.
with the text
Subject to the provisions of this rule, the Referee CAN, by
announcement,
impose Summary Judgment on a player. When e does so, e levies a fine of
up to 2 Blots on em. If e does not specify the number of Blots in the
fine,
the attempt to impose Summary Judgment is INEFFECTIVE. Summary
Judgement is
imposed on the Referee's own initiative, and not in response to any
official proceeding.
}
Jason Cobb
On 6/18/19 7:55 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
Instead of this:
The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by announcement.
I would recommend moving "by announcement" like so:
The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, by announcement impose
Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game.
Under the original wording it is ambiguous. Could have been read to say that SJ
could be imposed on a person-who-plays-by-announcement.
On Jun 18, 2019, at 7:32 PM, Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
Probably a good idea.
I withdraw my most recently submitted proposal.
I submit the following proposal:
Title: Rule 2479 Cleanup (v1.1)
Author: Jason Cobb
Adoption Index: 1.7
Text:
{
Amend Rule 2479 ("Official Justice") as follows:
Replace the text
The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by levying a fine
of up to 2 blots on em. Summary Judgement is imposed on the
Referee's own initiative, and not in response to any official
proceeding.
with the text
The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by announcement.
When e does so, e levies a fine of up to 2 Blots on em. If e
does not specify the number of Blots in the fine, the attempt to
impose Summary Judgment is INEFFECTIVE. Summary Judgement is
imposed on the Referee's own initiative, and not in response to
any official proceeding.
}
Jason Cobb
On 6/18/19 7:27 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
You might want to say that e must specify the number of Blots.
-Aris
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 4:25 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
I submit the following proposal:
Title: Rule 2479 Cleanup
Author: Jason Cobb
Adoption Index: 1.7
Text:
{
Amend Rule 2479 ("Official Justice") as follows:
Replace the text
The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by levying a fine
of up to 2 blots on em. Summary Judgement is imposed on the
Referee's own initiative, and not in response to any official
proceeding.
with the text
The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by announcement.
When e does so, e levies a fine of up to 2 Blots on em. Summary
Judgement is imposed on the Referee's own initiative, and not in
response to any official proceeding.
}
--
Jason Cobb
