Gratuitious: the caller emself admits that N is obviously intended to mean
a number. One meaning of N in this specialised context is to stand in  for
a number. This isn't even a policy argument, this would be a perfectly
textual holding.

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:56 AM Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote:

>
> The below CFJ is 3752.  I assign it to omd.
>
>
> ===============================  CFJ 3752  ===============================
>
>        Jason Cobb is guilty of the Class "I'm a string!" Crime of
>        Oathbreaking.
>
> ==========================================================================
>
> Caller:                        Jason Cobb
>
> Judge:                         omd
>
> ==========================================================================
>
> History:
>
> Called by Jason Cobb:                             02 Jul 2019 22:32:03
> Assigned to omd:                                  [now]
>
> ==========================================================================
>
> Caller's Evidence:
>
>      My previous message:
>
>          I pledge, under penalty of a Class "I'm a string!" Crime, not to
>          make any pledges for the next 24 hours
>
>      Excerpt from this message [sent after previous message]:
>
>          I pledge, under penalty of a Class "I'm a string!" Crime, not to
>          make any pledges for the next 24 hours.
>
>          I fully admit that I am guilty of the above accusation.
>
>      Excerpt from Rule 2450 ("Pledges"):
>
>          If a Player makes a clear public pledge (syn. Oath) to perform
>          (or refrain from performing) certain actions, then breaking the
>          pledge within the pledge's time window is the Class N crime of
>          Oathbreaking, where N is 2 unless the pledge explicitly states
>          otherwise. The time window of a pledge is 60 days, unless the
>          pledge explicitly states otherwise.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Caller's Arguments:
>
> This is so blatantly contrary to intent (especially since Rule 2557
> uses "Class N Crime", where N is obviously intended to be a number),
> but appears consistent with the wording, so I think this should be TRUE.
>
> ==========================================================================
>
>

-- 
>From R. Lee

Reply via email to