I don't think so.
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 06:08, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Did the below proposals ever get resolved? -G.
>
> On 6/22/2019 4:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > CoE: This leaves out my votes on Telnaior's behalf, which change the
> > outcome of at least one proposal I think (8184).
> >
> > On 6/22/2019 11:43 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
> >> I hereby resolve the Agoran decisions to adopt the below proposals. Each
> >> player has voting strength 3 unless otherwise noted. Murphy and omd sent
> >> messages that contained what appeared to be votes, but did not state that
> >> they did in fact cast those votes, so I have not counted them.
> >>
> >>
> >> PROPOSAL 8180 (Paying our Assessor)
> >>
> >> FOR: R. Lee#, D. Margaux, L, Aris, Owen, Falsifian, Jason Cobb, Walker, G.
> >>
> >> AGAINST:
> >>
> >> PRESENT:
> >>
> >> INEXTRICABLE: twg*+
> >>
> >> AI (F/A): 26/0 (AI=1)
> >>
> >> BALLOTS: 9 (quorum 9)
> >>
> >> OUTCOME: ADOPTED
> >>
> >>
> >> PROPOSAL 8181 (Referee CAN Impose Fines (v1.1))
> >>
> >> FOR: R. Lee#, D. Margaux, L, Aris, Falsifian, Jason Cobb, G., twg+
> >>
> >> AGAINST: Walker
> >>
> >> PRESENT: Owen
> >>
> >> AI (F/A): 21/3 (AI=1.7)
> >>
> >> BALLOTS: 10 (quorum 9)
> >>
> >> OUTCOME: ADOPTED
> >>
> >>
> >> PROPOSAL 8182 (Add value to zombies)
> >>
> >> FOR: R. Lee#, D. Margaux, L, Aris, Owen, Falsifian, Jason Cobb, twg+
> >>
> >> AGAINST: Walker
> >>
> >> PRESENT: G.
> >>
> >> AI (F/A): 21/3 (AI=3.0)
> >>
> >> BALLOTS: 10 (quorum 9)
> >>
> >> OUTCOME: ADOPTED
> >>
> >>
> >> PROPOSAL 8183 (Regulated Actions Reform)
> >>
> >> FOR: R. Lee#, D. Margaux, L, Aris
> >>
> >> AGAINST: Owen, Falsifian, Walker, G., twg+
> >>
> >> PRESENT: Jason Cobb
> >>
> >> AI (F/A): 11/13 (AI=3.0)
> >>
> >> BALLOTS: 10 (quorum 9)
> >>
> >> OUTCOME: REJECTED
> >>
> >>
> >> PROPOSAL 8184 (power-limit precedence)
> >>
> >> FOR: Aris, Owen, Falsifian, Walker, G., twg+
> >>
> >> AGAINST: D. Margaux, L
> >>
> >> PRESENT: R. Lee#, Jason Cobb
> >>
> >> AI (F/A): 16/6 (AI=3.0)
> >>
> >> BALLOTS: 10 (quorum 9)
> >>
> >> OUTCOME: REJECTED
> >>
> >>
> >> PROPOSAL 8185 (OUGHT we?)
> >>
> >> FOR: Aris, Jason Cobb, G.
> >>
> >> AGAINST: R. Lee#, D. Margaux, L, Owen, Falsifian, Walker
> >>
> >> PRESENT:
> >>
> >> INEXTRICABLE: twg*+
> >>
> >> AI (F/A): 9/16 (AI=3.0)
> >>
> >> BALLOTS: 9 (quorum 9)
> >>
> >> OUTCOME: REJECTED
> >>
> >>
> >> PROPOSAL 8186 (Minor currency fixes)
> >>
> >> FOR: D. Margaux, L, Aris, Owen, Falsifian, Jason Cobb, Walker, G., twg+
> >>
> >> AGAINST:
> >>
> >> PRESENT: R. Lee#
> >>
> >> AI (F/A): 25/0 (AI=3.0)
> >>
> >> BALLOTS: 10 (quorum 9)
> >>
> >> OUTCOME: ADOPTED
> >>
> >>
> >> PROPOSAL 8187 (Not so indestructible now, eh?)
> >>
> >> FOR: R. Lee#, D. Margaux, L, Aris, Owen, Falsifian, Jason Cobb, Walker, G.,
> >> twg+
> >>
> >> AGAINST:
> >>
> >> PRESENT:
> >>
> >> AI (F/A): 27/0 (AI=3.0)
> >>
> >> BALLOTS: 10 (quorum 9)
> >>
> >> OUTCOME: ADOPTED
> >>
> >>
> >> ————
> >>
> >> * Vote is inextricable because it ENDORSED a non-voter.
> >>
> >> # Voting strength is 2
> >>
> >> + Voting strength is 1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The full text of the ADOPTED proposals are included below.
> >>
> >>
> >> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >>
> >> ID: 8180
> >>
> >> Title: Paying our Assessor
> >>
> >> Adoption index: 1.0
> >>
> >> Author: Trigon
> >>
> >> Co-authors: D Margaux
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [ Comment: This is something I didn't include from the version of
> >>
> >> Rule 2496 that I didn't include for whatever reason. ]
> >>
> >>
> >> To Rule 2496 "Rewards" add the following bullet point after the third
> >>
> >> one:
> >>
> >> "Resolving an Agoran Decision on whether to adopt a proposal,
> >>
> >> provided that no other Agoran Decision on whether to adopt that or any
> >>
> >> other proposal had been resolved earlier in that Agoran week: 5 coins."
> >>
> >>
> >> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >>
> >> ID: 8181
> >>
> >> Title: Referee CAN Impose Fines (v1.1)
> >>
> >> Adoption index: 1.7
> >>
> >> Author: D Margaux
> >>
> >> Co-authors: Falsifian, twg
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Amend Rule 2478 to replace this text:
> >>
> >>
> >> “When a player Points a Finger, the investigator SHALL investigate the
> >>
> >> allegation and, in a timely fashion, SHALL conclude the investigation
> >> by:”
> >>
> >>
> >> With this text:
> >>
> >>
> >> “When a player Points a Finger, the investigator SHALL investigate the
> >>
> >> allegation and CAN, and in a timely fashion SHALL, conclude the
> >> investigation
> >>
> >> by:”
> >>
> >>
> >> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >>
> >> ID: 8182
> >>
> >> Title: Add value to zombies
> >>
> >> Adoption index: 3.0
> >>
> >> Author: Jason Cobb
> >>
> >> Co-authors:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Amend Rule 2574 as follows:
> >>
> >>
> >> Replace the text
> >>
> >> "Resale is a secured natural switch for zombies"
> >>
> >> with the text
> >>
> >> "Resale value is a secured natural switch for zombies".
> >>
> >>
> >> Replace the text "Resale value" in the third item of the only list
> >>
> >> with the text "resale value".
> >>
> >>
> >> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >>
> >> ID: 8186
> >>
> >> Title: Minor currency fixes
> >>
> >> Adoption index: 3.0
> >>
> >> Author: Jason Cobb
> >>
> >> Co-authors:
> >>
> >>
> >> Amend Rule 2578 ("Currencies") as follows:
> >>
> >>
> >> Replace all instances of the text '"Agora's official currency"' with
> >>
> >> the text "the official currency of Agora". [Note: this strikes the
> >>
> >> quotation marks]
> >>
> >>
> >> Amend Rule 2549 ("Auction Initiation") as follows:
> >>
> >> Replace all instances of the text "Agora's official currency" with
> >>
> >> the text "the official currency of Agora".
> >>
> >>
> >> Amend Rule 2483 ("Economics") as follows:
> >>
> >>
> >> Replace the text "Coins are the official currency of Agora tracked
> >>
> >> by the Treasuror." with the text "Coins are the official currency of
> >>
> >> Agora and are tracked by the Treasuror."
> >>
> >>
> >> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >>
> >> ID: 8187
> >>
> >> Title: Not so indestructible now, eh?
> >>
> >> Adoption index: 3.0
> >>
> >> Author: Jason Cobb
> >>
> >> Co-authors:
> >>
> >>
> >> [Comment: This fixes the underlying issue behind my recently submitted
> >>
> >> CFJ. This also allows contracts to destroy their own indestructible
> >> assets.]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Amend the first paragraph of Rule 2577 as follows:
> >>
> >>
> >> Replace the text
> >>
> >> "An indestructible asset is one defined as such by it backing
> >> document,
> >>
> >> and CANNOT be destroyed except by a proposal or rule, other
> >>
> >> than this one, specifically addressing the destruction of
> >> indestructible
> >>
> >> assets or that asset in particular"
> >>
> >> with the text
> >>
> >> "An indestructible asset is one defined as such by its backing
> >> document,
> >>
> >> and CANNOT be destroyed except as explicitly specified by its backing
> >>
> >> document"
> >>
> >>
> >> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >>
