Gratuitous: I don't think I understood G.'s argument. As far as I can tell, this is straightforward. R2579 says "To perform a fee-based action, an entity ... must announce", and later "Upon such an announcement". I think the first excerpt is clearly only talking about fee-based actions, and the second excerpt refers to the first and so is also only talking about fee-based actions. As G. points out in eir original argument, this is not a fee-based action. So R2579 does not define any mechanism for G. to destroy a Coin when no fee-based action is involved.
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 00:56, Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > > > The below CFJ is 3750. I assign it to twg. > > > =============================== CFJ 3750 =============================== > > In this message, G. destroyed a coin. > > ========================================================================== > > Caller: G. > > Judge: twg > > ========================================================================== > > History: > > Called by G.: 01 Jul 2019 15:29:30 > Assigned to twg: [now] > > ========================================================================== > > Caller's Arguments: > > The award in question is not a fee-based action at all. R2579 specifies > that if a *correct* fee-announcement is (but e.g. the actor does not have > the fee) then no asset holdings are changed. In the case of an > "incorrect" fee-announcement, there's no fail-safe that I can find one > way or the other - do the assets change? > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Caller's Evidence: > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 8:29 AM Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > > > > I award myself the Patent Title "nouveau riche" by paying a fee of 1 > > Coin for this sole purpose. > > ========================================================================== >
