On 11/10/19 7:17 PM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote:
I have a question about this hypothetical version:
Rule 2577/X
Asset Actions [Excerpt]
An asset generally CAN be transferred (syn. given) by announcement
subject to modification by its backing document. This can only be
done by its owner.
Would you say your scam works in that case? Because as I see it, that's just an
expanded form of the current wording.
Yep, I would argue my scam works as long as there is someone/something
capable of performing it by announcement.
--
Jason Cobb
