On Mon, 2020-01-20 at 01:42 +0000, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote: > I trusted (and still trust) em not to unnecessarily wreak havoc on > Agora if and when e is successful at perpetrating one.
I'm intrigued at the suggestion that there may be times when wreaking havoc on Agora is necessary. (I know there are a couple of occasions in the past when we passed rules with random effects that were perceived as likely to cause damage to the ruleset, as a method of shaking things up a little or just giving us something else to talk about. Perhaps that counts?) -- ais523
