On 1/21/2020 4:31 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote: > G. wrote: >>> 8293 Bernie, twg 1.0 CFJ Bait >> AGAINST. Only natural persons can register so this fails off the >> bat unless I miss something - not particularly interesting. > > The first sentence yes, but none of the others are expressly > conditional on that working :) > > Several of the others probably fail for similar reasons but afaict "I > grant myself 9 coins" meets the tests Aris outlined in eir judgement > on your version, which means several of the "I transfer X coins" may > work too. Genuinely have no idea what results it has if any.
Hmm, the Notice of Honour one might be interesting. If a proposal used our standard proposal style and said "G.'s karma is hereby increased by 1; nch's is hereby decreased by 1" it should work just fine (karma isn't secured or anything so proposals can change it). Does cloaking those two statements as a "notice of honour" make it subject e.g. to R2510(1)'s "be the first valid Notice of Honour that player has published..." which would invalidate it as it wasn't published by a player? Or do we just say that the "notice" label is syntactic sugar and the changes are made as if it was a pair of more normally-written proposal-specified changes. -G.
