On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 22:15, omd via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > 8316* Alexis 3.0 Zombie voting package > PRESENT; the fact that the new Rule 683 clause forces default votes to > be "valid" means that they could be submitted even by ineligible > voters. However, this would be scammable only as a Power 2->3 > escalation, thanks to the securing clause, so whatever. > dammit > > 8317e Alexis 2.0 Zombie trade > FOR; I like it. (But does this maintain existing resale values? I > think it does not, because it has an intermediate state where there > are rules mentioning both "resale value" and "integrity", which > probably prevents the name change from qualifying for the last > paragraph of Rule 1586.) > I'm not sure D&CoE applies because these are attributes, not entities. But I can see an argument that it creates a new switch with a new default, rather than replacing the existing one. -Alexis
