On Mon, Feb 3, 2020, 01:05 omd via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Hmm... Good point. It shouldn't be. The point was to clarify that > even if the gamestate doesn't have a list of legal fictions, legal > fictions can still exist due to rules (which are themselves part of > the gamestate). > Ah... so maybe your intention was to prevent rules from getting away with stuff like "this rule is treated as though its power were 5"? For what it's worth, I like this language (even though it will certainly never make it into Agora, for being too vague): A rule of lower power cannot enact, repeal, amend, override, subvert or interfere with a rule of higher power. —Warrigal >
