On Mon., Mar. 16, 2020, 07:12 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion, <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> This makes a lot of sense. I really like the situation with the Prime > Minister and Agoran consent of officeholders because it improves the > nature of the cabinet, but I think we will need to include a safeguard > against concentration of offices and create some structure for waiting > people's support or objection in such an Agoran consent according to > the number of offices they hold, similar to voting strength. I also > think that with the regulations, we should include some method by > which they could be changed automatically upon being elected or > otherwise coming to hold the office (either by deputisation or > imposition) to avoid the risk of binding obligations carrying over. > Interesting idea against concentration: not a bad one in general though. Perhaps a requirement that a player with a certain number of offices can only permanently deputise with notice? As for automatic changes when a player becomes an officer, like I said, I'd support that somewhat, but I don't think we need a separate mechanism as nothing stops a candidate from posting an intent during the election and then immediately resolving it when elected. In the unlikely event that someone doesn't feel comfortable having even a brief window where they are subject to the existing regulations, I think that the PM's ability to amend them could act as a decent out. -Alexis >
