On 5/3/2020 12:02 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 2:31 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal, "Restraining Motions", AI-3: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Amend Rule 2496 (Rewards) by replacing: >> * Judging a CFJ that e was assigned to without violating a time >> limit to do so: 5 coins (Arbitor). >> with: >> * Judging a CFJ that e was assigned to without violating a time >> limit to do so, unless at the time of judgement the case was >> open due to self-filing a motion to reconsider it: 5 coins >> (Arbitor). >> >> >> Amend Rule 2438 (Ribbons) by replacing: >> Blue (B): When a person assigns a judgement to a CFJ, and has >> never violated a time limit to assign a judgement to that CFJ, >> that person earns a Blue Ribbon. >> with: >> Blue (B): When a person assigns a judgement to a CFJ, and has >> never violated a time limit to assign a judgement to that CFJ, >> nor ever self-filed a motion to reconsider that CFJ, that person >> earns a Blue Ribbon. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > > I think some change is necessary, but I think that keeping the reward for > genuine reconsideration would be good. What about allowing the Tailor and > Arbitor to determine whether it should be awarded and prohibit them from > ever giving themselves such a reward? > Definitely agree - my first cut is that group-filed motions still provide rewards, on the grounds that if other people think it's worth reconsideration it's probably genuine - do you think we need to add additional for "genuine" self-filed corrections somewhere? One thought is to grant some (or all?) officers a small monthly purse (I'd say 20 coins or so) that they can use to reward other people (maybe w/support of a non-awardee) who did something useful for their office, or to make up something if their office created an unavoidable injustice (rules bug cheating someone out of a reward or suchlike)...? -G.
