On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 12:14 AM Rebecca via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 1 > > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:35 PM Aris Merchant via agora-business < > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 9:24 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business > > <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 5/6/2020 6:36 PM, Rebecca wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 9:55 AM Reuben Staley wrote: > > > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > >> I judge FALSE. > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Trigon > > > > > > > > You accurately recite our arguments, but you don't actually provide > any > > > > reasoning as to why one is superior to another apart from "I think" > > and so > > > > forth. I intend to group-file a motion to reconsider with 2 support > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, yes I think I might agree but it would be good to know why? I > > > support. Regardless, here's an attempt to clean up the conversation > > > between Aris and R. Lee, for the case record, let me know if I missed > > > anything... > > > > > > I very much appreciate the judge's adoption of my arguments, and I > > sincerely thank em for it. I, of course, agree (this isn't one of > > those cases where I'm making arguments as devil's advocate). However, > > I would like to know precisely which part of my arguments was the > > basis for the decision. It would certainly be helpful in future cases. > > Thus, while continuing to express my approval of the verdict, I > > support and do so. > > > > -Aris > > > I file a motion to reconsider, having 2 support. > > Also this is a notice of honour > -1 Trigon. There are about six paragraphs of introduction to this judgement > and just one of "analysis" The last paragraph of this judgement is exactly > the sort of paragraph to be avoided because it's all waffle and no > argument. "Far more convincing", "doesn't seem to indicate or even imply". > +1 Falsifian timely performance of registrar's duties For the record, I already did so, so you can't file the motion. -Aris > >
