1) I think this is already a thing? Like, we can have that: - The internal computation of a contract is decided by some contract-defined mechanism which is then observed and interpreted by the outside of Agora. For example "the interpretation of this contract shall be considered to be what John Doe says it is", and then John Doe states the interpretation, and then Agora interprets that statement to compute the contract. - Or the computation of the contract is interpreted by Agora (without any "interpretations of interpretations") anyways because the scope of CfJs includes them.
Like, whatever happens (barring possible weirdness), I'm under the impression that contracts are fully trapped within the jurisdiction of Agora's CfJs regardless. Also, aren't all contracts public already? We had that big cleanup and all before, where all "hidden" ones were destroyed and stuff like that, so they aren't a thing anymore, I assume? 2) I'm pretty confused about this lol. You mean Finger Pointing to real life events? Or things like certain social interactions here in Agora's mailing list? About the victim blaming example, I also really don't think that bringing up politics and morality at large into Agora is going to be a good idea unless we're playing pretend to act a certain way. For example, being Cheetos extremists who praise Cheetos as absolute. Like that nobody has to champion themselves any certain view. I'm fine with the mini-political/moral arguments about how nomic and games are run and what happens, I adore it, actually. I find it very interesting. But getting to greater, real life stuff - oh boy. It might work because I feel like our opinions are very homogeneous but I don't want some minority of people to feel pushed away because they happen to be muslim or whatever and we're circlejerking morality which is against their beliefs. On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:07 PM David Nicol via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > (1) judiciary thing: craft some immutables that allow contracts to specify > Agora Nomic Arbitration Services as their venue of dispute resolution, > possibly including stuff like all eligible contracts must be public and > parties must pay a registration point (however those are to be obtained) to > register such a thing with Agora. > > (2) police thing: legislate some crimes -- like "victim blaming in a tweet" > -- that can reasonably be prosecuted on the internet only, and provide a > framework for reporting, adjudicating, and shaming perpetrators (not a > whole lot else Agora can do to them) until they submit Indulgence points > (however those are to be obtained.) > > Thoughts? > > > -- > With great risk comes spectacular failure >
