On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 1:44 PM James Cook via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 07:10, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > Here's a different version of P.S.S.'s proposal. Eirs didn't work > > because you can't take an action that would cause the game to become > > ossified, only attempt one. Also, it didn't cover the game ceasing to > > exist or proposals. Plus I added some other stuff. LMK what y'all > > think and if people like it I'll submit with whatever changes are > > necessary before distribution. > > > > I've split the penalty for being a proposal author into two parts > > because it seemed to me that there should be a lesser penalty if it > > gets caught before almost messing things up, but the total penalty if > > it isn't should be the same. I'm too tired to explain this properly, > > but I welcome comments. > > > > -Aris > > I think it's well-written. > > I don't know if I would vote for it, as I'm not sure it's really > needed. I would like the ruleset to be shorter (with a possible > exception if one of the ideas to make a hierarchy of rules finally > gets adopted). Is there any motivation for it, beyond the obvious idea > of encouraging people to be careful?
Some combination of being a fixed version of P.S.S's proposal, encouraging people to be careful, and "more fun crimes". Ruleset length isn't something I'm particularly worried about personally, though I understand where you're coming from. -Aris
