On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 10:41 AM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/15/20 7:36 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > > I disagree with this bit. Since it's a by-announcement action, it's > > governed by this in R478: > > > >> that person performs that action by unambiguously > >> and clearly specifying the action > > So the "creation" is done by "specifying during the announcement" as a > > single action - the use of the word "specify" in R2350 determines what > > specifications are necessary (or optional) for the creation announcement > > to meet R478's "clear specification" standards. > > > Yep, you're right. Perhaps the condition should really be that each > property specification is phrased a separate speech act, rather than the > creation and specifications being separate? > > -- > Jason Cobb > > I don't believe that's right. I think the condition should be that the mandatory attributes are separate from the optional ones. So: "I create a proposal with the following title and text, and specify the following other attributes" would probably be good enough text for non-atomicity. -- >From R. Lee
