On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:00 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > On 5/20/2020 2:49 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote: > > On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 01:31, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > >>> On May 19, 2020, at 21:27, nch wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:07:27 PM CDT Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I vote REMAND. > >>> > >>> Why remand instead of remit? Alexis can't actually rejudge it right now. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> nch > >> > >> That’s true, but I want to symbolically communicate my confidence in > >> Alexis’s ability to judge the case. > > > > I vote REMAND for the same reason. > > > > Not that it's a big deal, but this seems like odd logic - Alexis has > judged the case. Why not AFFIRM if you're respecting judgement ability? > No new facts or arguments have been presented, so this is being overturned > on wholly a matter of people's opinions differing from Alexis. REMAND is > as much "your opinion is wrong" as a REMIT in that situation, right? > > -G. >
In my opinion, REMAND is "your opinion is wrong, so revise it", while REMIT is "your opinion is wrong and I don't trust you to revise it". I don't think that that's the message that others are sending, but that's how the two options seem in my mind.
