On 5/21/2020 5:10 PM, grok via agora-discussion wrote: > I'm not 100% convinced that having a hybrid keyword is necessary when two > non-hybrid keywords effectively explain it and it only comes up in the > rules once, but I think it makes enough sense if WILL gets further use in > the rules later.
I counted 14, some with more convoluted language than the example given. Just wanted to get suggestions on the definition before writing up every substitution.
