On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 8:51 AM Alex Smith via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 3 June 2020, 11:44:08 GMT+1, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > For the purposes of lime ribbons, does being an author count as being > > a co-author? > > Lime Ribbons were intended for being someone who improved other people's > proposals, rather than writing proposals yourself. It's historically been a > hard ribbon to get, but that's arguably a good thing. So it's intentional > that it only counts coauthors, not the actual author. > > I find that spending a week or two properly reviewing other people's > proposals and pointing out mistakes/improvements in them tends to get you a > Lime Ribbon naturally, but it's hard to get without special effort, and > that's prettty much everything that we want from a Ribbon. > > -- > ais523
Okay, that's good context to have. My assumption was that it doesn't count, and then R. Lee's proposal showed that others agree. Based off of this logic, which I like, I plan to vote AGAINST R. Lee's proposal.
