On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 02:47, Rebecca via agora-discussion
<agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:42 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > What do y'all think of these? If there's a strong consensus for one or
> > the other, I'll only submit that one.
> >
> > -Aris
> > ---
> > Title: Rule Violations (option 1)
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: Aris
> > Co-author(s):
> >
> >
> > If the author's proposal "Rule Violations (option 2)" has been or
> > would be adopted with a greater proportion of support, then this
> > proposal has no effect. Otherwise:
> >
> > Amend Rule 869, "How to Join and Leave Agora", by appending at the end of
> > the
> > fourth paragraph:
> >   Players SHOULD NOT violate the rules.
> >
> > ---
> > Title: Rule Violations (option 2)
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: Aris
> > Co-author(s):
> >
> >
> > If the author's proposal "Rule Violations (option 1)" has been or
> > would be adopted with a greater proportion of support, then this
> > proposal has no effect. Otherwise:
> >
> > Amend Rule 869, "How to Join and Leave Agora", by appending at the end of
> > the
> > fourth paragraph:
> >   Players SHOULD NOT violate the rules doing so is manifestly in the
> >   best interests of the game due to extraordinary circumstances.
> >
>
> I would vote against both because they both add text to the rules that we
> don't need and both are already perfectly implicit anyway. But I would
> greatly prefer the first one, given a choice (the second also has a typo,
> it is missing the word "unless")

The first version also seems implicit to me. If we both feel that way
I take that as evidence it might not actually resolve our
disagreement. I think I would be PRESENT or a weak FOR on that one.

I think I prefer the second, sort of grudgingly. The exception it
describes is not part of my personal view of the rules, but (a) our
escape valve for distributing unpended proposals depends on this point
of view and (b) if it's in the rules, then I guess the rules are okay
with it... so, I think it has my vote.

I'd prefer lower-case "should" based on ais523's argument.

- Falsifian

Reply via email to