On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 2:50 PM James Cook via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 22:27, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via > agora-business <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 6:06 PM nch via agora-business > > <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 6/10/20 4:22 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > > > > > > > > I ossify Agora. > > > > > > > I point my finger at G. for Faking. At least one person believed e had > > > ossified Agora, and acted on it. > > > > > > > > > > I find this finger pointing to be valid; I impose the Cold Hand of > > Justice by levying an unforgivable fine of 1 blot on G. because this > > was clearly intentional but inconsequential. However, as a result of > > this, I believe that any attempt to impose a fine for the Indictment > > would be INEFFECTIVE because it is the same conduct for which e is > > being fined here. In other words, the plot thickens. > > I'm not convinced it was made with the intent to mislead. It looked to > me like an obvious attempt to test DADA with an action that doesn't > actually do anything. > > So now we have a buggy indictment process and a lesser fine which may > or may not have been successfully levied and so may or may not block > the indictment process from leading to a fine. > > - Falsifian
The appropriate means to appeal would be to CFJ on whether my fine was EFFECTIVE. If it were found to be INEFFECTIVE, we would then fine em through the Indictment, but I've realized that the Indictment process probably still has to occur even though the fine at the end couldn't be imposed.
