On 6/16/2020 4:11 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > On 6/16/20 6:59 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >>> Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, a player CAN, by announcement, >>> transfer the talisman for em to emself. >> Could we make this "acting as emself"? Without that, people could >> transfer eir zombies back to themselves in order to reset resale value. > > > There's a goal here (as requested by G.) not to make any changes that > impact gameplay. I don't want to re-litigate anything about zombies. > You've found something interesting, but I won't fix it here.
This trick was used at least once (in 2018 sometime) and I thought about using it once or twice since then, but sorta privately decided it was unethical. No real bias on if this is bug/feature (other than my request to pull out functional changes for separate voting). >> Could we let zombies be transferred from person to person? > > Theoretically, yes. Again, however, I'm trying not to make any semantic > changes to zombies. This has been discussed before, and I might end up > writing a proposal for it, but it won't be done here. Last time this was seriously discussed (again ~2018 I think) it was controversial. Can't remember if it was voted down or never proposed. Not sure my own opinion this time but again deserves discussion on its own. -G.
