On 6/30/20 7:57 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion wrote: > On 6/30/20 8:52 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote: >> On 6/30/20 5:47 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business >> wrote: >>> AGAINST (I'd be supportive of this if it didn't get rid of Certifiable >>> Patches) >> Is the 2+X support mechanism not a sufficient replacement? Why not? >> > No, it's not because of its use of a dependent action and the fact that > only the Promotor can use it.
What's wrong with it being a dependent action? Support can be resolved as soon as you have the support. -- nch Prime Minister, Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager
