On 7/1/20 11:05 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote: > FWIW I will probably vote AGAINST both of these as I have a black ribbon > already, and the way this is worded, I'm not sure I could even get black > glitter from it. Correct me if I'm wrong, however.
I believe you would get black glitter. Rule 2438: > Black (K): An Instrument CAN, as part of its effect, cause a > person to earn a Black Ribbon. When this occurs, this Rule awards > that person a Black Ribbon. If you were to vote FOR, then you would "earn" a Black Ribbon. Rule 2438 would then attempt to award you a Black Ribbon (thus flipping your Ribbon Ownership to include Black), but it would fail since you already have it. However, the following clause would still apply: > A person qualifies for a type of Ribbon if e has earned that type > of Ribbon within the preceding 7 days (including earlier in the > same message). Since you would have earned a Black Ribbon within the past 7 days, you would qualify for it. If we then look at the final paragraph: > While a person qualifies for a type of Ribbon: > > - If e has not owned that type of Ribbon within the preceding 7 > days, any player CAN, by announcement, award em that type of > Ribbon. > > - Otherwise, if e has not been awarded that type of Ribbon or > the corresponding type of Glitter since e last earned or came > to qualify for that type of Ribbon, and has not been so > awarded five or more times within the past 24 hours, e CAN, by > announcement, award emself that type of Glitter. You would have owned a Black Ribbon within the preceding 7 days, and you would have just earned and come to qualify for a Black Ribbon, so you would be able to award yourself the Glitter. -- Jason Cobb
