On 12/20/20 9:43 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business
wrote:
> Title: Specified Crime not Rule
> Authors: PSS, nix
> Power: 1.7
> Text: {
> Amend Rule 2478, "Vigilante Justice" by replacing the first paragraph
> with the following:
> A player CAN by announcement, but subject to the provisions of
> this rule, Point eir Finger at a person (the perp) who plays the
> game; the announcement has to explicitly name the perp, cite a
> specific rule or named crime, and specify an alleged violation of
> that rule or commission of that crime by that person.
> [ This will allow someone to use the name of a crime without specifying
> which rule defines it. ]
> }
What's the difference between "a person who plays the game" and
"player"? Is there a reason you chose that verbiage?
Also I don't think it hurts to include it but I also don't think "but
subject to the provisions of this rule" is necessary.
--
Webmastor, Ministor
