On 12/20/20 9:43 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business wrote: > Title: Specified Crime not Rule > Authors: PSS, nix > Power: 1.7 > Text: { > Amend Rule 2478, "Vigilante Justice" by replacing the first paragraph > with the following: > A player CAN by announcement, but subject to the provisions of > this rule, Point eir Finger at a person (the perp) who plays the > game; the announcement has to explicitly name the perp, cite a > specific rule or named crime, and specify an alleged violation of > that rule or commission of that crime by that person. > [ This will allow someone to use the name of a crime without specifying > which rule defines it. ] > }
What's the difference between "a person who plays the game" and "player"? Is there a reason you chose that verbiage? Also I don't think it hurts to include it but I also don't think "but subject to the provisions of this rule" is necessary. -- Webmastor, Ministor