On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 11:32 AM Reuben Staley via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 12/13/20 11:28 PM, Lucidiot via agora-discussion wrote: > > Le 13/12/2020 à 23:28, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion a écrit : > >> > >> On 12/10/20 8:46 AM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote: > >>> On 12/9/2020 11:12 PM, Lucidiot via agora-discussion wrote: > >>>> Le 10/12/2020 à 02:35, ATMunn via agora-business a écrit : > >>>>> > >>>>> On 12/9/2020 8:30 PM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote: > >>>>>> On 12/9/2020 7:13 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-official wrote: > >>>>>>> This auction was a selective-bid auction. The awardees are as > follows: > >>>>>>> [Protection Stone] -> Murphy for 135 coins. > >>>>>>> [Sabotage Stone] -> Murphy for 130 coins. > >>>>>>> [Wealth Stone] -> ATMunn for 169 coins. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I pay a fee of 169 coins to transfer the Wealth Stone from Agora to > >>>>>> myself (for real this time). > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I wield my Wealth Stone in order to cause myself to earn 5 boatloads > of > >>>>> coins (23 coins). > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> There was a mistake in the rounding method in the Floating Rate > >>>> Schedule, it's actually 24 coins. > >>>> (ceiling(4.6212*5) = 24, but Trigon used floor) > >>>> > >>>> I don't know if it should be CoE'd > >>>> > >>> > >>> I think it's fine as long as the Treasuror records it correctly. The > >>> important thing is that I wielded the stone and specified myself. > >>> > >> > >> Indeed, Rule 2645 specifies that wielding the stone performs the effect > >> instantly. The boatloads and its translation into coins were > >> supplemental effects. Also, for future reference, Claims of Error are > >> reserved for inaccuracies in reports. In this case the action just > >> failed and the best you could do would be to inform the player of such > >> thing. > >> > > > > Sorry, I wasn't clear enough: I meant CoEing the Floating Rate Schedule, > > since the conversion table is slightly off. I just wanted to avoid > > extra confusion in the next Forbes, since some can wonder why they got > > one extra coin. > > > > The conversion table was a courtesy that I put in the FRS. I don't > believe that claims of error are able to be issued on anything except > for self-ratifying sections of reports. Precedent seems to disagree. CFJ 1420 said that the list of watchers could be CoE'd, despite not being defined by the rules. The current rules are a bit different, and you could make a pretty fair argument that, under recent precedent, the conversion table is a separate document that wasn't required to be published. But even then, you SHOULD issue a revision, you just NEED NOT do so. The relevant current rule is Rule 2201. -Aris >
