On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 09:01:09PM -0800, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 7:49 PM Falsifian via agora-discussion > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > Okay, it's reasonable to take advantage of precedent that way. Does the > > precedent actually talk about "free will" in those words? > > > > If it weren't obvious that the word "willingly" is trying to do > > something special in this context, I might interpret it with some > > mundane sense that isn't really about "free will" (e.g. willingly could > > just not offering objections or resistence; doing something without > > needing to be forced). But I guess that sort of meaning wouldn't really > > make sense in that context anyway. > > > > Anyway, I remain okay with the "willingly" wording. > > CFJ 1895. Over a decade old, and I'm sure I could find something more > recent, but it's very comprehensive. > > -Aris
Thanks, that's interesting. I find it amusing the way this new text solves our definition problem by carefully deferring to Agora's wealth of precedent. -- Falsifian
