On 2021-08-16 19:01, D. Wet via agora-discussion wrote:
16 aug. 2021 10:54:42 Telna via agora-discussion
<agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>:
On 2021-08-16 18:44, D. Wet via agora-business wrote:> Doesn't this
mean, together with the renouncement of Murphy as a judge,
that by Rule 2553 I have won the game?
-- D. Wet
www.nomica.nl
Rule 2553 "Win by Paradox" specifically requires a CFJ to be judged
PARADOXICAL, which is something very different to what has happened here.
And how is PARADOXICAL different from the inability up till now to
decide whether the text is clear or unclear?
(Trying to learn the nuances here.)
--
D. Wet
www.nomica.nl
PARADOXICAL is a judgement that can be assigned as an alternative to
TRUE or FALSE, as described in Rule 591 "Delivering Judgements". It is
to be used when the case is logically undecidable due to something
relevant to the game itself. Currently the case is open, which means it
has no assigned judgement at all.
Right now there is dissent over the truth of the matter, but to claim a
win by paradox a judge would need to decide that the answer is entirely
undecidable as the result of a paradox. That is unlikely here as the
difficulty in settling a judgement is stemming from a challenging rule
interpretation rather than a logical error.
