On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:06 AM Sarah S. via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:03 PM D. Wet via agora-discussion < > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > > 31 aug. 2021 01:29:32 Falsifian via agora-discussion > > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>: > > > > >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > >> ID: 8598 > > >> Title: > > >> Adoption index: 1.0 > > >> Author: G. > > >> Co-authors: > > >> > > >> > > >> I create a proposal with this sentence as its text, and make it > > >> pending. > > > > > > I feel sympathy for our brave Promotor. > > > > > It seems like my newbie action has inspired a new direction to explore? > > Or is this unrelated? > > > > That action itself was inspired by trying to play a reverse Gödel's > > statement 'This statement is unproveable in this system of axioms'. > > Probably aided by the fact that my English is not proficient enough (yet) > > to play a language-game. > > > > Unfortunately it does not qualify as PARADOXICAL ... only as ambiguous. > > > > I like the reflection of Aspen on the matter. > > > > Should and could I do something to make progress on the CFJ besides my > > vote? > > -- > > D. Wet > > www.nomica.nl > > > I think the CFJ called on your proposal is the longest and most > controversial CFJ I at least have ever seen. Sorry for all the bother about > that.
It's definitely in my top five, probably my top three. I'd be curious to hear from G. and ais523, who have been here longer than I have. -Aspen
